Picture this: In a music world forever changed by The Beatles, John Lennon boldly declared that only one artist could truly carry their torch forward. Who was it? And why does it still spark heated debates today?
Credits: Far Out / Alamy
Published on Wednesday, December 31, 2025, at 8:57 UK Time
When we look back at The Beatles, it's tricky to separate what's real from the massive buzz they've built up over the years. They're frequently hailed as the most groundbreaking band ever, often seen as the root from which so much of today's music has sprouted. Yet, for some music enthusiasts, they're simply overhyped, just another group caught up in an avalanche of exaggerated praise. This divide isn't new—it's part of a broader cultural phenomenon where time softens our view of things, making the ordinary seem extraordinary.
Consider nostalgia for a moment; it's a quirky force that can turn everyday experiences into something magical. Think about revisiting your all-time favorite childhood flick—maybe something like a classic animated adventure. Now, imagine chatting with someone a bit older or younger than you and asking their take on it. Odds are, they might not feel the same spark, or worse, they might even roll their eyes at it. A prime illustration? Millennials reminiscing about Steven Spielberg's Hook—a film that many adored as kids but now view with a mix of fondness and cringe. Could The Beatles be victims of this same rose-colored hindsight, where past icons are glorified beyond their actual merits? But here's where it gets controversial: Are we dismissing a genuine revolution in music, or is the hype blinding us to their flaws?
No, I think we can confidently say The Beatles were trailblazers. From the instant they burst onto the scene, it was clear they were in a league of their own. Amidst the wave of bands emerging during that era, only The Beatles earned such widespread awe and respect. And as their journey ended in 1970, fans and critics alike wondered who might step into their shoes. One name that kept popping up was T. Rex.
The connections between The Beatles and T. Rex are striking, especially in how their paths mirrored each other. Just as The Beatles disbanded, the glam rock sensations of T. Rex ignited a frenzy of excitement reminiscent of the original Beatlemania.
That said, Beatles legend John Lennon reportedly had his reservations about glam rock. He allegedly confided to David Bowie in 1974 that it was merely "rock 'n' roll with lipstick on." Yet, his bandmate Ringo Starr took a different stance—he and T. Rex's charismatic frontman Marc Bolan shared a close friendship, bonded by a strong respect for each other's creativity. And this is the part most people miss: Was Lennon's comment sincere, a joke, or perhaps even fabricated? Let's dive into the details.
Intriguingly, either Bowie's account of Lennon's glam rock skepticism is completely inaccurate, or Lennon was just pulling a prank with his remark. This insight comes from a deep dive by the Mac Bolan and T. Rex fan site, Till Dawn, where contributor 'Michel L.' shares a translation of a March 1972 piece from the French-Canadian music publication Photo-Vedettes. This discovery is huge because it captures Lennon singing Bolan's praises, calling him "the only one who can succeed to The Beatles."
As 'Michel L.' explains: "This is a French article (translation is mine) published in March 1972 in a French-Canadian pop newspaper called Photo-Vedettes. I became friends with this guy, Michel Goodwill, later on as I came to write for the same newspaper. And we met Marc together, later on in September, for The Slider Tour. I found this on October 14 during the Beatles Convention in Montreal. -Michel L."
In the piece, Lennon is directly quoted saying: "In today’s pop music, there are only two things that interest me: rock ‘n’ roll and avant-garde poetry. Only one group today is of interest to me, Marc Bolan and T Rex. He is the only one who has excited me, and I look forward to meeting him again. His music is good rock ‘n’ roll; it has good beat, and it really swings."
He wraps up with: "But it is mainly his lyrics that amaze me. His way of writing is new, and I have never read lyrics as funny and as real as his. Apart from few American exceptions, Marc Bolan is the only one that has caught my attention, and I believe his mythology is real as well. He will release a book of poetry in the near future, and I look forward to read it again and again. Marc Bolan is the only one who can succeed to The Beatles."
To put this in perspective for beginners, glam rock was a flamboyant style of music in the early 1970s, characterized by flashy costumes, glitter, and a mix of rock energy with theatrical flair—think bold makeup and elaborate outfits that turned concerts into spectacles. Lennon seemed to appreciate Bolan's take, which blended catchy tunes with inventive wordplay, far from just surface-level gimmicks.
It's worth noting that Lennon used similar glowing language for other acts too, like Electric Light Orchestra (ELO), the band fronted by Jeff Lynne, which he dubbed "The Beatles’ sons." But his admiration for Bolan felt uniquely profound—Bolan was no ordinary talent.
Bolan's legacy extended far beyond music; he profoundly influenced pop culture, from fashion to art, before his untimely death in a car crash just shy of his 30th birthday. Looking back, his effect was monumental. As U2's guitarist The Edge put it so eloquently: "It felt like he actually cast a spell. I’ve no doubt every aspect of how he presented himself was just an outpouring of his understanding that things could be magical, things could be heightened. Out in the ordinary world, he managed to cast a spell over all of us."
For context, Bolan's spell included pioneering a style that inspired countless artists, proving his influence wasn't just hype—it was a real cultural shift, much like how The Beatles redefined rock.
Related Topics
Never Miss A Beat
The Far Out Beatles Newsletter
Get all the latest updates on The Beatles from the independent voice of culture. Delivered straight to your inbox.
So, what do you think? Was Marc Bolan truly the rightful successor to The Beatles, as Lennon claimed, or was this just a moment of overenthusiasm? Do you believe nostalgia unfairly inflates The Beatles' legacy, or is their impact undeniable? And here's a controversial twist: Could Lennon's praise for Bolan hint at a broader underappreciation of glam rock in rock history? Share your opinions, agreements, or disagreements in the comments below—let's keep the conversation going!
