PDA

View Full Version : Granholm urged to raise taxes to balance budget


fasterbusa
09-02-2009, 10:16 AM
More bad and stupid news here.

Now that they have killed off most of the Auto Industry, why are these fools in the Legislature thinking that the State still has large sums of cash to grab for?

*****
http://www.freep.com/article/20090902/NEWS15/90902035/1001/rss01

Group says tax structure is outdated
By Dawson Bell
Free Press Lansing Bureau

LANSING - A newly formed coalition of education, labor and social service agencies calling itself A Better Future for Michigan said this morning the state should reform its tax structure and raise nearly $3 billion a year in new revenue rather than relying on spending cuts to balance the budget.

The group said Michigan's tax code is antiquated and unsustainable, leading to revenue shortfalls that are doing irreparable harm to public schools, health programs and aid to senior citizens.

It called on Gov. Jennifer Granholm and the Legislature to:

• Close tax loopholes for business to raise $600 million.

• Impose sales tax on what the group's leaders called "luxury and nonessential" services (like entertainment, recreation, landscaping and spa treatments), raising $1.65 billion.

• Reinstate inheritance taxes to raise $100 million.

• And seek voter approval for a graduated income tax that would raise about $600 million a year in new revenue.

The graduated income tax would have a top rate of 6.9% for high wage earners, with others paying the current rate of 4.35%, and lower income earners paying 3.9%.

Sharon Parks, director of the Michigan League for Human Services, said, "The handwriting is on the wall. We've got a tax structure that just doesn't work for the 21st Century."

Other members of the coalition said Michigan schoolchildren will be left behind in the global economy and that vital health programs will be lost if elected officials choose, instead, to cut programs rather than raise taxes.

While program cuts may provide short-term savings, Michiganders will suffer in the long run if they are less healthy and less well-educated, said Ken Fletcher, of the Michigan Nurses Association.

Granholm and top lawmakers are scheduled to meet again this week in an attempt to resolve differences over how to address a potential $1.8-billion state budget deficit in 2010.

Although some elected officials, including Granholm, have expressed interest in eliminating some business tax exemptions, none of the top leaders has endorsed any broad-based tax increases.

Socks2Bed
09-02-2009, 10:23 AM
and this again is why i didnt VOTE for HER!!!!! Hell if Canada didn't want her that should have been your 1st CLUE!!!

AlmightyS
09-02-2009, 10:41 AM
and this again is why i didnt VOTE for HER!!!!! Hell if Canada didn't want her that should have been your 1st CLUE!!!

And if Obama did not want her that is your second clue

tikki50
09-02-2009, 11:52 AM
screw it, why dont we just tax the crap out of the unemployed while were at it. GOD, this state is so F'ed up its not funny.

Mudpuppy
09-02-2009, 12:32 PM
Interesting........
City, State, % of People Below the Poverty Level

1. Detroit, MI 32.5%
2. Buffalo, NY 29..9%
3. Cincinnati, OH 27.8%
4. Cleveland, OH 27.0%
5. Miami, FL 26.9%
5. St. Louis, MO 26.8%
7. El Paso, TX 26.4%
8. Milwaukee, WI 26.2%
9. Philadelphia, PA 25.1%
10. Newark, NJ 24.2%

U.S. Census Bureau, 2006 American Community Survey, August 2007 What do the top ten cities (over 250,000) with the highest poverty rate all have in common?

Detroit, MI (1st on the poverty rate list) hasn't elected a Republican mayor since 1961;

Buffalo, NY (2nd) hasn't elected one since 1954;

Cincinnati, OH (3rd)...since 1984;

Cleveland, OH (4th)...since 1989;

Miami, FL (5th) has never had a Republican mayor;

St. Louis, MO (6th)....since 1949;

El Paso, TX (7th) has never had a Republican mayor;

Milwaukee, WI (8th)...since 1908;

Philadelphia, PA (9th)...since 1952;

Newark, NJ (10th)...since 1907.

Einstein once said, 'The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.'

It is the poor who habitually elect Democrats---yet they are still POOR "You cannot help the poor by destroying the rich. You cannot strengthen the weak by weakening the strong. You cannot bring about prosperity by discouraging thrift. You cannot lift the wage earner up by pulling the wage payer down. You cannot further the brotherhood of man by inciting class hatred. You cannot build character and courage by taking away people's initiative and independence. You cannot help people permanently by doing for them, what they could and should do for themselves."
Abraham Lincoln

..................and Mr. Obama, you are no Abe Lincoln

fasterbusa
09-02-2009, 01:28 PM
Because they are all promised "Free stuff" each time.

Interestingly, Mr. Lincoln is Mr. Obama's favorite President and he very much admires Mr. Lincoln.

Yet, Mr. Obama is pretty much in favor of going against everything in that quote from Mr. Lincoln.

Just perfect!

Mudpuppy
09-03-2009, 10:23 AM
Because they are all promised "Free stuff" each time.

Interestingly, Mr. Lincoln is Mr. Obama's favorite President and he very much admires Mr. Lincoln.

Yet, Mr. Obama is pretty much in favor of going against everything in that quote from Mr. Lincoln.

Just perfect!

Yep thought you might like that sir.

It's redonkeylous... that is the only word that sums it up..

Here is an example I like to use about Obama..

During his campaign he promised "change" and "hope". He did not, however, specify it was good change or that you would be hoping for death because it would be far less painful. It would be no different than to say the school system is now going to implement a new program of kids working with animals coupled with a new chemistry curriculum.. Now what the school really means by this is they are going to feed your young daughters cocaine and do donkey shows in the school yard to sell child p*rnography films for personal profit - see the point is the school never said the new program was a good thing you would assume it is since they are changing it and you would be sadly mistaken like we are as a country because the majority (not me) elected barry-o-merica. It's all how you word it. Know what I mean? That is how Obama works - he tells you what you want to hear (like a used car salesman) but not what he really means. He is the kind of guy that just banged your wife, stole your life savings, wrecked your toilet leaving you a cloud deck littered in corn filled excrement and got your cat pregnant that you end up thanking for his services.

MilleArp
09-10-2009, 03:20 PM
I take a certain amount of pride that I did not vote for Granholm, ever. Or any of the Levin's, ever. Or that self-admittedly higly-socialist Stab-me-now.

In a handbasket folks... in a handbasket.

.